Can Data Lie? Social Media Titans’ Super-Speed Recovery and the Pervasive Disputes (II)
Advertisement
In a way, Twitter is becoming what Zuckerberg calls “the arbiter of truth”. This has enabled twitter to gain some support. But at the same time, there’s also a lot of opposition, who think Twitter has crossed the line.

Although Dorsey has been explaining that Twitter doesn't want to be the arbiter of truth, there are still quite a few people who think they are treated differently because of their different opinions. Gradually, some users’ distrust of twitter was fueled and ignited. Some users even chose to leave Twitter. Therefore, some unknown social platforms took over this part of the traffic.
Snapchat: Two Sides of “Privacy Protection”
Snapchat’s woes, compared with the fact-check troubles of Facebook and Twitter, are largely due to its lack of privacy. Snapchat’s claim to fame has always been its privacy feature, automatically deleting so-called ephemeral messages or after a period of time.
Advertisement
Ironically, the social network’s biggest criticisms have also been on its privacy practices. In September 2019, former employees came out, anonymously, of course, to reveal that the company hasn’t exactly been exercising due diligence in making sure that a special tool primarily used for law enforcement and fighting abuse isn’t being abused by employees themselves to spy on Snapchat users.
That internal tool is called SnapLion, which is able to access data such as location, phone numbers, email addresses, and saved Snaps that haven’t been automatically deleted yet.
Over time, SnapLion has also grown to be used by Snapchat itself to fight bullying and harassment on the platform, but it was supposed to be limited only to employees that actually do need such access, from the company’s security staff to “spam and abuse” teams. As one former employee reveals, SnapLion has also been used to get that same user data for illegal purposes, which means users should probably presume that anything unencrypted is going to be viewable by humans.
For an application that provides the function of “deleting after reading”, users would no doubt have more faith in its privacy and thus send more intimate information. In this case, despite Snapchat’s quick denial of the revelation, the rumor still spooked lots of users, with lasting negative effects.
Advertisement
- Previous article
- Can Data Lie? Social Media Titans’ Super-Speed Recovery and the Pervasive Disputes (Ⅰ)
- Next article
- Can Data Lie? Social Media Titans’ Super-Speed Recovery and the Pervasive Disputes (III)
Advertisement
OTHER NEWS
Local News’ Transition to Paid Content In the Context of Layoffs, Mergers and Bankruptcies II
BY Jessica
Turkey Slaps Advertising Ban on Twitter and Other Platforms under Its New Social Media Law
BY Carter
Dubai Economy Records 132% Increase in DED Trader Licenses
BY Morris
Google Is Paying A High Price to Apple Every Year
BY Sean
2021 Social Media Prediction: Twitter—Improving User Experience from Details (II)
BY Young
San Francisco: Tax adjustment for high paying corporations
BY Theresa
RECENT NEWS
-
Analysis of the Apple sales slump: A multi-perspective view!
-
The Tencent-Apple dispute: The ripples triggered by the ‘Apple tax’.
-
PUBG Mobile Esports Generated 200 Million Hours of Viewing in 2020
-
Mario Kart Tour Races to $200M revenue and 200M Downloads
-
Game Acquisitions Expand Globally in Q1 2021 with 280 Deals Worth $39 Billion Surpassing That in 2020
-
The Games Fund Launched a $50 Million Early Investment Fund to Invest in American and European Companies
1
1